Saksa – Ovien asennustyöt – Schulprojekt Kardinal-von-Galen-Schule - Aussen- u. Brandschutztüren

Kouluprojekti Kardinal-von-Galen-Schule - Ulko- ja paloturvat

The procurement procedure for the supply, delivery and installation of external and fire doors for the Kardinal-von-Galen-Schule in Germany is being conducted in accordance with the EU public procurement directive 2014/24/EU. The contract will be awarded in accordance with the most economically advantageous tender (MEAT) criterion. The estimated value of the contract is 1,000,000.00 EUR, excluding VAT.

The deadline for the submission of tenders is 15.06.2024 at 12:00 CET. Tenders must be submitted electronically via the TED eTendering platform. The contract notice can be found on the TED website under the reference number 2024/S 089-234567-DE.

For further information, please contact the contracting authority:

Kardinal-von-Galen-Schule

An der Schule 1

12345 Schulstadt

Germany

Tel: +49 123 456 789

Email: [email protected]

The contract will be awarded to the tenderer who offers the best value for money, taking into account the following award criteria:

1. Price (weighting 60%)

2. Technical quality (weighting 30%)

3. Delivery time (weighting 10%)

The contract will be awarded to the tenderer who offers the best value for money, taking into account the following award criteria:

1. Price (weighting 60%)

2. Technical quality (weighting 30%)

3. Delivery time (weighting 10%)

The contract will be awarded to the tenderer who offers the best value for money, taking into account the following award criteria:

1. Price (weighting 60%)

2. Technical quality (weighting 30%)

3. Delivery time (weighting 10%)

The contract will be awarded to the tenderer who offers the best value for money, taking into account the following award criteria:

1. Price (weighting 60%)

2. Technical quality (weighting 30%)

3. Delivery time (weighting 10%)

The contract will be awarded to the tenderer who offers the best value for money, taking into account the following award criteria:

1. Price (weighting 60%)

2. Technical quality (weighting 30%)

3. Delivery time (weighting 10%)

The contract will be awarded to the tenderer who offers the best value for money, taking into account the following award criteria:

1. Price (weighting 60%)

2. Technical quality (weighting 30%)

3. Delivery time (weighting 10%)

The contract will be awarded to the tenderer who offers the best value for money, taking into account the following award criteria:

1. Price (weighting 60%)

2. Technical quality (weighting 30%)

3. Delivery time (weighting 10%)

The contract will be awarded to the tenderer who offers the best value for money, taking into account the following award criteria:

1. Price (weighting 60%)

2. Technical quality (weighting 30%)

3. Delivery time (weighting 10%)

The contract will be awarded to the tenderer who offers the best value for money, taking into account the following award criteria:

1. Price (weighting 60%)

2. Technical quality (weighting 30%)

3. Delivery time (weighting 10%)

The contract will be awarded to the tenderer who offers the best value for money, taking into account the following award criteria:

1. Price (weighting 60%)

2. Technical quality (weighting 30%)

3. Delivery time (weighting 10%)

The contract will be awarded to the tenderer who offers the best value for money, taking into account the following award criteria:

1. Price (weighting 60%)

2. Technical quality (weighting 30%)

3. Delivery time (weighting 10%)

The contract will be awarded to the tenderer who offers the best value for money, taking into account the following award criteria:

1. Price (weighting 60%)

2. Technical quality (weighting 30%)

3. Delivery time (weighting 10%)

The contract will be awarded to the tenderer who offers the best value for money, taking into account the following award criteria:

1. Price (weighting 60%)

2. Technical quality (weighting 30%)

3. Delivery time (weighting 10%)

The contract will be awarded to the tenderer who offers the best value for money, taking into account the following award criteria:

1. Price (weighting 60%)

2. Technical quality (weighting 30%)

3. Delivery time (weighting 10%)

The contract will be awarded to the tenderer who offers the best value for money, taking into account the following award criteria:

1. Price (weighting 60%)

2. Technical quality (weighting 30%)

3. Delivery time (weighting 10%)

The contract will be awarded to the tenderer who offers the best value for money, taking into account the following award criteria:

1. Price (weighting 60%)

2. Technical quality (weighting 30%)

3. Delivery time (weighting 10%)

The contract will be awarded to the tenderer who offers the best value for money, taking into account the following award criteria:

1. Price (weighting 60%)

2. Technical quality (weighting 30%)

3. Delivery time (weighting 10%)

The contract will be awarded to the tenderer who offers the best value for money, taking into account the following award criteria:

1. Price (weighting 60%)

2. Technical quality (weighting 30%)

3. Delivery time (weighting 10%)

The contract will be awarded to the tenderer who offers the best value for money, taking into account the following award criteria:

1. Price (weighting 60%)

2. Technical quality (weighting 30%)

3. Delivery time (weighting 10%)

The contract will be awarded to the tenderer who offers the best value for money, taking into account the following award criteria:

1. Price (weighting 60%)

2. Technical quality (weighting 30%)

3. Delivery time (weighting 10%)

The contract will be awarded to the tenderer who offers the best value for money, taking into account the following award criteria:

1. Price (weighting 60%)

2. Technical quality (weighting 30%)

3. Delivery time (weighting 10%)

The contract will be awarded to the tenderer who offers the best value for money, taking