Poland – Public relations services – Świadczenie usług PR

The subject of the contract is the provision of services involving the development of a communication strategy for the AI HUB project and the provision of comprehensive, strategic and executive PR support for the AI HUB project and the implementation of communication, promotional and information activities for other areas of NASK's activities. 2. The Detailed Description of the Subject of the Contract is contained in Annex No. 1 to the SWZ. 3. The Contracting Authority requires that the subject of the contract, including all ICT products, ICT services and ICT processes used to implement the contract, does not include: 1) ICT products, ICT services or ICT processes indicated in the recommendation referred to in Article 33(4) of the Act of 5 July 2018 on the national cybersecurity system (Journal of Laws of 2026, item 20 and 252), stating their negative impact on the fundamental interest of the state's security, 2) an ICT product, the type of which was determined in a decision recognising the supplier as a high-risk supplier, referred to in Article 67b(15) of the Act of 5 July 2018 on the national cybersecurity system, or an ICT service, or an ICT process, specified in that decision. If the Contractor offers a solution referred to in point 1) or 2) above, the offer will be rejected under Article 226(1)(17) or (19) of the Pzp Act. 4. Contract implementation period: The contract will be in force from the moment of conclusion for a period of 15 months or until the budget allocated for the implementation of the contracts is exhausted, whichever event occurs first. In the event that the budget allocated for the implementation of the contract is not exhausted, the contract will be extended for a further 6 months in accordance with the change of contract clause provided for in the Contract Template, or until the budget is exhausted, whichever event occurs first. 5. In cases where the detailed description of the subject of the contract indicates trademarks, patents, origin, source or a special process that characterises the products or services provided by a specific Contractor, which would lead to the privileging or elimination of certain contractors or products, this means that the Contracting Authority cannot describe the subject of the contract using sufficiently precise terms and this is justified by the specificity of the subject of the contract. In such situations, any references to trademarks, patents, origin, source or a special process, should be read with the words “or equivalent”. 6. In cases where references to standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and reference systems, referred to in Article 101(1)(2) and (3) of the Pzp Act, have been used in the description of the subject of the contract, the Contracting Authority, in accordance with Article 101(4) of the Pzp Act, allows the use of equivalent solutions. Each time a standard, technical assessment, technical specification or technical reference system is indicated in this SWZ, it should be understood that the phrase “or equivalent” has been used in relation to it. 7. By the term equivalent solutions, the Contracting Authority means a solution that meets the conditions specified in the SOPZ to an equivalent degree. 8. The Contractor who refers to equivalent solutions described by the Contracting Authority is obliged to prove in the offer, in particular by means of the evidential means referred to in Articles 104-107 of the Pzp Act, that the solutions proposed by it meet the requirements specified in the description of the subject of the contract to an equivalent degree. Evidence, in particular evidential means referred to in Articles 104-107 of the Pzp Act, confirming that the solutions proposed by the Contractor meet the requirements specified in the description of the subject of the contract to an equivalent degree, are not subject to supplementation. 9. The Contracting Authority does not allow the possibility of conducting negotiations to improve the content of the offers submitted in response to the contract notice. 10. Method of evaluating offers: The Contracting Authority, when selecting the most advantageous offer from the offers not subject to rejection, submitted in response to the contract notice, will be guided by the criteria and their significance and will evaluate the offers within the framework of the offer evaluation criterion. The Contracting Authority will award the contract to the Contractor whose Offer obtains the highest number of points.