Poland – Firefighting, rescue and safety equipment – Zakup średniego samochodu ratowniczo-gaśniczego dla OSP Lipnik

The subject of the contract is the „Purchase of a medium-sized fire rescue vehicle for OSP Lipnik”. 2. The Contractor shall supply and commission a factory-new medium-sized fire rescue vehicle, fully described in Annex No. 8 to SWZ – Description of the Subject of the Contract (OPZ). 3. Equivalence clause: 1) The Purchaser, in accordance with the provisions of Article 99(5) and Article 101(4) of the Pzp Act, allows equivalent solutions for supplies, works, materials, systems that meet the requirements specified in the contract documents. The Purchaser reserves the right to treat trademarks, patents or the origin of devices or materials specified in Annex No. 8 to SWZ – Description of the Subject of the Contract, which constitutes a description of the subject of the contract, as proposals only. The Purchaser allows methods, materials, devices, systems, technologies, etc. equivalent to those presented in the description of the subject of the contract. Therefore, it is possible to propose in the offer all equivalent market counterparts with properties no worse than those indicated by the Purchaser. The parameters indicated in the contract documents determine the minimum technical, operational, user, quality and functional conditions that the subject of the contract must meet. In the offer, methods, materials, devices, systems, technologies can be accepted, but with technical, quality and user properties and functional. At the request of the Purchaser, the Contractor is obliged to prove that the solutions applied will allow achieving all the technical assumptions for the subject of the investment task, taking into account the entire investment, and not the selected fragment of the whole. The burden of proof that a material or device is equivalent in relation to the requirement specified by the Purchaser lies with the Contractor. If the materials and/or devices offered by the Contractor as equivalent are not equivalent in the light of the documents submitted by the Contractor, the offer of this Contractor will be rejected as not meeting the content of the SWZ. In the case of describing the subject of the contract by reference to standards, European technical assessments, approvals, technical specifications and technical reference systems, the Purchaser allows the execution of the contract with the use of solutions equivalent to those described. In such a case, the procedure described in the earlier part of this point is applied accordingly; 2) in the case of technologies, systems, materials or devices equivalent to those accepted by the Contractor for pricing, the offer must be accompanied by a list of these technologies, systems, devices or materials, which will contain in its content: the type and description of the technology or system used, the names of the device/material used, the names of the manufacturer, the precise and unambiguous type of device or material; 3) moreover, for equivalent technologies/systems/devices/materials, the Purchaser requires documentation of equivalence, including calculations, detailed technical drawings, certificates, approvals, declarations of compliance with regulations and standards, and catalog cards of the manufacturers of equivalent devices/materials. These documents must unequivocally state the equivalence of the proposed technologies/systems/devices/materials; 4) in case of doubts about the equivalence of the equivalents of technologies/systems/devices/materials proposed in the offer, the Purchaser may, at the stage of examining the offer, require proof (documentation) of equivalence. In particular, for this purpose, it may require the Contractor to present catalogs of the manufacturer of the given technology/systems/devices/materials equivalent. In particular, equivalent technologies/systems/devices/materials will be evaluated in terms of the possibility of achieving the specified level of functionality for technologies/systems/devices/materials, operating costs, reliability of operation.