Poland – Machines and apparatus for testing and measuring – „Zakup urządzeń na potrzeby Pracowni Metod Oceny- w podziale na 2 części”

The subject of the order is as follows: - for part 1 of the order: the purchase and delivery of specialist equipment intended for the construction of the Evaluation Methods Laboratory (concept of creating laboratory workstations) for the National and Academic Computer Network – National Research Institute in Warsaw, in accordance with the list indicated in the SWZ. - for part 2 of the order: the purchase and delivery of equipment intended for the construction of the Evaluation Methods Laboratory (concept of creating skill enhancement workstations) for the National and Academic Computer Network – National Research Institute in Warsaw in the form of 1 unit of a group videoconferencing system. 2. The Detailed Description of the Subject of the Order is contained in Annex 1a to the SWZ for part 1 and in Annex 1b to the SWZ for part 2. 4. The ordering party requires that the subject of the order offered, including all ICT products, ICT services and ICT processes used to implement the order, does not include: 1) ICT products, ICT services or ICT processes indicated in the recommendation referred to in Article 33(4) of the Act of 5 July 2018 on the national cybersecurity system (Journal of Laws of 2026, item 20 and 252), stating their negative impact on the fundamental interest of the security of the state, 2) an ICT product, the type of which was determined in a decision on recognising the supplier as a high-risk supplier, referred to in Article 67b(15) of the Act of 5 July 2018 on the national cybersecurity system, or an ICT service, or an ICT process, specified in that decision. If the Contractor offers a solution referred to in point 1) or 2) above, the offer will be rejected on the basis of Article 226(1) point 17) or point 19) of the Pzp. 5. Order implementation deadline: For part 1: The order implementation deadline is up to 50 calendar days, counted from the date of the contract signature. The ordering party requires a minimum two-year warranty to be provided on the delivered equipment. The warranty period will be counted from the date of signing the quality protocol. 6. The ordering party requires the Contractor to complete the description of the offered equipment in accordance with the requirements specified in the template - Annex 2 to the SWZ – Offer Form. The ordering party demands that the description of the offered assortment includes the manufacturer/model/name or other data unambiguously identifying the offered equipment. The description of the offered assortment is an integral part of the offer and does not allow for supplementation. In the event of failure to submit a description of the offered equipment or failure to indicate data unambiguously identifying the offered equipment or its parameters, the ordering party will reject the offer on the basis of Article 226(1) point 5 of the Act. 7. In cases where the detailed description of the subject of the order indicates trademarks, patents, origin, source or a special process that characterises the products or services supplied by a specific Contractor, which would lead to the privileging or elimination of certain contractors or products, this means that the ordering party cannot describe the subject of the order using sufficiently precise terms and this is justified by the specificity of the subject of the order. In such situations, any references to trademarks, patents, origin, source or a special process, should be read with the words “or equivalent”. 8. In the event that references to standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and reference systems, referred to in Article 101(1) point 2 and (3) of the Pzp, are used in the description of the subject of the order, the ordering party, in accordance with Article 101(4) of the Pzp, allows the use of equivalent solutions. Whenever a standard, technical assessment, technical specification or reference system is indicated in this SWZ, it should be understood that the phrase “or equivalent” is used in relation to them. 9. By the term equivalent solutions, the ordering party means a solution that meets the conditions specified in the SOPZ to an equivalent degree. 10. The Contractor who refers to equivalent solutions described by the ordering party is obliged to prove in the offer, in particular by means of evidential means referred to in Articles 104-107 of the Pzp, that the solutions proposed by him meet the requirements specified in the description of the subject of the order to an equivalent degree. Evidence, in particular evidential means referred to in Articles 104-107 of the Pzp, confirming that the solutions proposed by the Contractor meet the requirements specified in the description of the subject of the order to an equivalent degree, do not allow for supplementation. 11. The ordering party does not allow the possibility of conducting negotiations to improve the content of the offers submitted in response to the order notice. 12. Method of evaluating offers: The ordering party, when selecting the most advantageous offer from the offers not subject to rejection, submitted in response to the order notice, will be guided by the criterion and its significance and will evaluate the offers within the framework of the offer evaluation criterion. The ordering party will award the order to the Contractor whose Offer obtains the highest number of points.